[GRADE A1 — EFTA00011437, EFTA00011438, EFTA00011440, EFTA00011441 (DOJ DataSet 8, improperly redacted PDFs)]
Esteban Juan Ganoza — Black Book, Page 21:
Esteban Juan Ganoza appears on page 21 of Epstein's personal address book with six phone numbers and two Peruvian addresses:
Address 1 — Lima:
Address 2 — Trujillo:
New York contacts:
Duke of York — Black Book, Page 16:
The entry for "Duke of York" on page 16 includes:
This email address directly matches the sender of the "Invisible Man" emails below, confirming identification.
The following four documents were extracted from DOJ DataSet 8 (10,593 PDFs). The DOJ applied visual "redaction" overlays (black boxes) without removing underlying text, allowing full extraction via standard PDF text tools. These documents were first analyzed in the phelix001/epstein-network open-source project (December 25, 2025 extraction).
Document 1: EFTA00011437 — August 16, 2001
From: "The Invisible Man" to Ghislaine Maxwell
The sender writes from "Balmoral Summer Camp for the Royal Family," describing activities that take place all day and leaving him "totally exhausted." He references "Girls" being "completely shattered" and needing "an early night." He then asks Maxwell: "Have you found me some new inappropriate friends?"
Identification markers: Balmoral Summer Camp, "Royal Family," signs "A xxx," mentions leaving the Royal Navy ("I have left the RN"), and references a valet who "had been with me since I was 2" — consistent with royal household staff.
Document 2: EFTA00011440 — August 18, 2001
From: Ghislaine Maxwell to "The Invisible Man"
Maxwell replies: "So sorry to disappoint you, however the truth must be told. I have only been able to find appropriate friends." She then references "church meetings on those dates." This exchange establishes the coded vocabulary: "inappropriate friends" = the type of companions Maxwell procured; "church meetings" = likely code for arranged meetups.
Document 3: EFTA00011438 — February 27–28, 2002
Multiple participants: Ganoza (jganoza@terra.com.pe), Maxwell (gmax1@mindspring.com), "Andrew" (aace@dial.pipex.com)
This is the critical procurement document. Ganoza, writing from Peru, discusses arranging a visit including horseback riding (Peruvian Paso horses) and the Nazca Lines. He then asks Maxwell: "About the girls... how old is he? I doubt it that he will find someone here, but we can try."
"Andrew" responds to Maxwell: "As for girls well I leave that entirely to you and Juan Estoban!"
The age question in the context of arranging "girls" is characterized in the DataSet 8 analysis as procurement coordination — Ganoza asks the visitor's age to determine what age companions to provide.
Document 4: EFTA00011441 — March 3, 2002
From: Ghislaine Maxwell to Juanesteban Ganoza, forwarded to "Andrew"
Maxwell provides explicit instructions: "I just gave Andrew your telephone no. He is interested in seeing the Nazca Lines. He can ride but it is not his favorite sport ie pass on the horses."
She then writes: "Some sight seeing some 2 legged sight seeing (read intelligent pretty fun and from good families) and he will be very happy."
Maxwell emphasizes discretion: "I know I can rely on you to show him a wonderful time and that you will only introduce him to friends that you can trust and rely on to be friendly and discreet and fun." She adds: "He does not want to read about any trip in the papers whom or what he saw."
Maxwell describes the visitor as a "very English sounding gentleman."
The "Invisible Man" / "Andrew" / "A" is confirmed as Prince Andrew, Duke of York through convergent evidence:
| Identifier | Source | Confirmation |
|---|---|---|
| Email: aace@dial.pipex.com | EFTA00011438 sender | Matches Black Book p.16 "Duke of York" |
| "Balmoral Summer Camp for the Royal Family" | EFTA00011437 | Only British Royal Family uses Balmoral |
| "I have left the RN" (Royal Navy) | EFTA00011437 | Andrew left active RN service in 2001 |
| Signs "A xxx" / "Love you A xxx" | Multiple documents | Consistent with "Andrew" |
| "very English sounding gentleman" | EFTA00011441 | Maxwell's description to Ganoza |
| Six-day official Peru visit, March 2002 | British media | Queen's Golden Jubilee tour |
Prince Andrew's six-day official visit to Peru in March 2002 is independently documented in British media as part of the Queen's Golden Jubilee celebrations. The visit included official engagements in Lima. The timing aligns precisely with the Maxwell-Ganoza coordination emails from February 27 to March 3, 2002.
Critical absence in jmail archive: A temporal search of all Maxwell emails from February–March 2002 in the jmail database returned only 3 emails — brief personal messages unrelated to Peru. The EFTA00011437–11441 documents do not appear in the jmail email archive, confirming they were released separately as individual DOJ documents from DataSet 8 rather than through the EFTA email database.
The ICIJ Panama Papers (data current through 2015) reveal multiple Ganoza family members as officers of Mossack Fonseca–administered offshore entities:
| Name | Country | ICIJ Node ID | Structure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Maria Pedro Antonio Ganoza Carrillo | Peru | 12148507 | Officer of offshore entity |
| Talia Beatriz Ganoza Dulanto | Peru | 12194465 / 12199583 | Officer (2 entities) |
| Maira Beatriz Ganoza Dulanto | Peru | 12194464 / 12199584 | Officer (2 entities) |
| Talia & Maira Ganoza Dulanto (joint) | Peru | 12194466 | Joint tenancy with rights of survivorship |
The relationship between these Panama Papers officers and Juan Esteban Ganoza Temple has not been confirmed, but the shared surname and Peruvian origin are notable. The Ganoza family is one of Peru's prominent families with roots in Trujillo — matching the Black Book's second address (Pizarro 428, Trujillo, Peru). The joint tenancy structure for the Dulanto-Ganoza entities suggests family wealth management through offshore vehicles.
Juan Esteban Ganoza Temple (also rendered as "Juanesteban Ganoza" in DataSet 8 documents) comes from one of Peru's most prominent families:
Parents:
Siblings:
Stepfather — CRITICAL CONNECTION:
Significance of the Perez de Cuellar connection: Juan Esteban Ganoza Temple's stepfather was the former UN Secretary-General. When the Ganoza-Maxwell-Andrew emails were exchanged in February–March 2002, Perez de Cuellar had just left the PM role (July 2001) and was serving as Ambassador to France. This family positioning explains why Maxwell chose Ganoza as a local facilitator: he could provide access to Peru's social elite ("from good families") through connections extending to the highest levels of Peruvian and international diplomacy.
San Isidro (Lima 27) is one of Lima's most affluent districts. The "Pizarro 428, Trujillo" address places the family near the historic colonial center and the Casa Ganoza Chopitea (a registered heritage site).
Ganoza has stated publicly that he met Maxwell during a stay in New York in the 1980s and characterized Epstein's crimes as "abominable," denying any visit to Epstein's private island or residences. Peruvian outlet Buena Pepa has reported on a "package" Epstein sent to Ganoza in Trujillo — the underlying documents for this claim have not been located.
The epstein-network focused entities database categorizes Ganoza as: role = "Peru contact - arranged 'girls'", category = "associate", with 5 documented connections to Ghislaine Maxwell.
WHAT THIS SHOWS AND DOES NOT SHOW: The EFTA documents — extracted from improperly redacted DOJ PDFs — contain explicit procurement language: Ganoza asks about the visitor's age in the context of arranging "girls," Maxwell instructs Ganoza to provide "2 legged sight seeing" (a euphemism she defines as "intelligent pretty fun and from good families"), and the visitor ("Andrew") delegates the "girls" arrangement to Maxwell and Ganoza. The Black Book email match (aace@dial.pipex.com = Duke of York) provides definitive identification. The Panama Papers reveal the broader Ganoza family maintained offshore structures. However, these documents do NOT establish that minors were involved, that any sexual activity occurred during the Peru visit, that Ganoza was aware of Epstein's criminal enterprises, or that the "girls" ultimately arranged were underage. Ganoza's public denial is noted. The coded language and emphasis on discretion are consistent with patterns documented in Maxwell's 2021 sex trafficking conviction, but the Peru visit itself has not been the subject of criminal charges.